🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements over subsidies that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.