🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that may create as many as five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, grants a request by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its decision.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

Through a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a violation of the constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, boundary revision happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, in response, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer welcomed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

In contrast, opposition party leaders criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic leader stated the court had yet again shredded its credibility by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.